I’m a book junkie; I freely admit it.
That’s pretty common for an author. I’ve only known a few writers who say they don’t read much or they don’t have time. I must confess, I always glance askance at those who say such things. Because let’s face it — we make time for the things that are important to us.
So when I hear an author say (s)he doesn’t like to read, I have to arch a brow. Why the heck is this person writing books if (s)he doesn’t like to read them? I don’t suffer from that particular eccentricity. I freakin’ love books, always have.
Books were my best friend when I was a dorky little kid. I’d take an apple, some bread, and cheese along with a book and go up a tree. There was a huge one in my yard that overlooked the road with a perfect, kid-sized niche where I could curl up for the whole day, lost in my stories. I could watch the other kids go by on their bikes, hidden in the foliage. It was like having a wonderful secret.
Do I feel like I missed out on something by choosing to spend my childhood with fictitious people instead of real live playmates? To be honest, not really. I mean, if you’ve spent any time around kids, you know they can be fuckin’ mean. Any hint of weakness or difference, and they’re on you like a pack of wolves. The dude who wrote Lord of the Flies clearly knew his way around the schoolyard.
This weekend, I just shut everything off. I haven’t been checking email as often or surfing the web. I’ve been reading. And I can’t think of anything better suited to rainy season than curling up with a good book and a cup of hot cocoa. Here are some titles that I’ve read in the last 48 hours:
Holding All the Cards
Natural Law
Ice Queen
Mirror of her Soul
Mistress of Redemption
Magic Bites
Blood Bound
Yes, I read that fast.
However, I noticed something in Magic Bites and Blood Bound, something that bugged me. Both authors dissed romance novels in their urban fantasies. Let me find the passages…
Okay, from Magic Bites, page 117:
When writers of sappy romances ranted about “glorious curves tapering to a small waist” and “soft flesh that begged to be explored,” they had her in mind.
I’m not sure what I’m supposed to extrapolate from that. Am I to infer that all romance is, by definition, sappy? How many romances has the author read, I wonder? I don’t think writers of romance, sappy or otherwise, ever rant about a woman’s figure. Rhapsodize, perhaps. I loved this book; don’t get me wrong. I just don’t understand this particular line.
Is there not supposed to be any genre crossover? Are romance readers supposed to stuff their money back in their wallets because clearly they’re too puffy-heart bubble-headed to understand sophisticated urban fantasy? Talk about shooting yourself in the foot and alienating a mess of readers.
Does the author not realize that romance readers account for 55% of all genre fiction sold? You won’t find me writing this in my SF series. There’s romance in it too, and I hope like heck that all the romance readers out there will give my series a shot.
And from Blound Bound, page 93:
“If Jesse hadn’t come in, I would have surrendered myself to Adam, like some heroine from a 1970s series romance, the kind my foster mother used to read all the time. Ick.”
Well, I have a soft spot for 1970s series romance. I like a happy ending. That doesn’t mean they have to be married and breeding up a mess of babies; I just want to know they’re going to be okay, which means safe and happy.
I don’t even mind traipsing through ten books to get there; I’m a series-friendly reader. But if you drag me along for a hair-rising ride, and then off the protagonists in the end, I am not gonna be a happy bunny. I mean, fuck, I might as well be reading “literature,” if everyone dies or learns horrible, depressing life lessons.
In its way, series romance offers as much fantasy as pulp Conan novels. How many women have you known you who married their bosses, who turned out to be Greek billionaires? It just doesn’t happen. And what’s wrong with escapist fiction? Arguably, all of SF/F qualifies as exactly that. So what’s the difference? Anyway, I still love these books, but it did feel like a little smack on the nose because I’m feeble enough to read those “other” books and… *gasp*…like them! Plus, how many times do you read a romance novel and find the heroine or hero dissing fantasy novels? It just doesn’t happen.
Anyway, I move on with a shrug.
There are some authors whose work I want to like, whom other readers rave about. So I pick up the books, excited to see what all the fuss is about. And sometimes I just don’t get it. I mean, I agree the writer has the ability to string words together in an artistic way, but the story doesn’t engage me. I always suffer a vague feeling of disappointment when this happens, like there’s something slightly askew in my head because I can’t get what everyone else does. The sensation passes, of course. Reading is a deeply subjective experience and just because the herd loves something and I don’t, that doesn’t mean there’s something wrong with me. It just means I’m my own person.
Some authors I consistently enjoy, no matter what they’re writing. I become immersed in their books with no effort at all. People like Nora Roberts, Judith Ivory, Laura Kinsale, Patricia Briggs, Linda Howard, Robin McKinley, Patricia McKilip, Connie Willis. I could go on forever, but instead I’ll just say that I’m tickled to add Ilona Andrews to that list. I cannot wait for the sequel to Magic Bites.
What authors have you not liked as much as you expected, based on buzz? And who landed on your auto-buy list? As always, commenters will be entered into a drawing. However, to make matters more interesting, I’m keeping the prize a secret. You just never know what I’ll give away, though. And do you really need a prize to discuss your favorite authors?
I thought not. Bring on the fangirl squee. Feel free to comment on the dissing I mentioned as well. Whatever floats your boat.
Byrdloves2Read, come on down. You won a copy of Your Alibi. Email me to claim your prize!